| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
   |
Posted - 2011.06.10 15:14:00 -
[1]
Passmark rating:
GeForce GTX 295- 1711
GeForce GTX 460 SE - 2084
GeForce GTX 460- 2353
GeForce GTX 470- 2966
GeForce GTX 560- 2652
GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 2956
Theoretical raw shader power stats (GFLOPs):
GeForce GTX 295- 1788.480
GeForce GTX 460 SE - 748.8
GeForce GTX 460- 907.2
GeForce GTX 470 - 1088.64
GeForce GTX 560- 1088.6
GeForce GTX 560 Ti - 1263.4
Practical test results : from here to here.
Note however that the review is for the 560 Ti, not the "just 560", which is weaker than the Ti model.
Long story short - the 295 is sometimes better, sometimes worse compared to the Ti, and almost certainly almost always better than the non-Ti.
The only good reasons to get a 560 instead of your old 295 would be :
* power consumption (170W vs 290W) and maybe noise
* if you really, really want DX11 features and not just DX10.0
* if you're thinking of maybe going SLI mode (eventually)
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.11 16:37:00 -
[2]
3-way GTX 580 SLI 
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.12 05:10:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Akita T on 12/06/2011 05:18:03
@Reiisha
4000: good. - 150nm fab, Feb 2002 -> early 2003
5000: bad. - few 150, most 130nm fabs, Jan 2003 -> early 2004
6000: good. - 130, 110 and 90nm fabs, April 2004 -> late 2005
7000: bad. - 110 and 90nm fabs, June 2005 -> late 2007
8000: good. - "Tesla" 90, 80 and 65nm fabs, Nov 2006 -> early 2008
9000: meh. - 65 and 55 nm fabs, Feb 2008 -> late 2008
100 : ??? - 55nm fab all in March 2009
200: good. - 65, 55 and 40nm fabs, June 2008 -> late 2009
300 : ??? - 40nm fab, mostly OEM cards, slightly improved 200s, Nov 2009 -> early 2010
400: meh. - 40nm fab "Fermi" March 2010 -> early 2011
500: good. - 40nm fab "Fermi+" Nov 2010 -> May 2011 ?
600: ??? - 28nm fab "Kepler", projected in late autumn or early winter 2011
700: ??? - most likely a "Kepler+" version (still 28nm fab), mid-2012 to late 2012
800: ??? - 22nm fab "Maxwell", probably by mid-2013
"Sauce"...
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.12 21:55:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Akita T on 12/06/2011 21:56:01
 Originally by: Amaroq Dricaldari
What the hell did you do to that thing?
Either two additional fans glued on, and the one on the right fell off, OR just one extra that was originally glued on the right moved to the left.
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.14 16:52:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Akita T on 14/06/2011 16:53:11
Originally by: Amaroq Dricaldari
Now can you modify a GTX 590 to make it more effecient?
Define "efficient".
Get more FPS regardless of heat ?
Use less power for a certain target FPS ?
Improve the cooling system ?
What exactly ?
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
Akita T
Caldari Navy Volunteer Task Force
|
Posted - 2011.06.15 11:19:00 -
[6]
I was merely copypasting and filling into Reiisha's very short list of "judgments", then kept adding more and more info without removing the initial text.
I have a GTX 460 myself and I'm rather happy with it.
_
Make ISK||Build||React||1k papercuts
|
| |
|